Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Beans 'n dreams


We seem to have grown too big for our boots lately (in the nicest way possible we hope). So for this reason, we have upped sticks to the slightly more ample platform of:

http://readmesomethingyoulove.com/

See you there, p'raps?

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Strolling Storylines: The Proustian Pleasures of Walking Whilst Listening to Short Stories

Nicholas Royle has blogged recently about how he gets a lot of his reading done by walking. That’s not audio books + walking, by the way, but actual ambulatory reading: on a pavement, through the lingerie department of Debenhams, going up and down steps and escalators in tube stations, reading.

My response to this is twofold.

a) Are you quite insane Nicholas Royle?! Apart from the cognitive overload, and thus diminishment in attention and returns for both activities, are you not just setting yourself up as Nerd Fodder for louts and ne’er-do-wells to bother? You might as well be wearing a faded Dinosaur Junior t-shirt that has TRIP ME UP/MUG ME printed on the back of it.

b) Absolute, unabashed glee. I want to move up to Manchester and live right next door to Nicholas Royle just so that I can watch him from my window weaving his way down the road with a Richard Yates’ collection held in front of his face. Or maybe we could walk along the pavement together, dodging lampposts, synced to same page of the same short story collection, like a teenage twosome stepping down the high street sharing a single headphone.

Thinking about Royle’s reading habit has also filled me with an incredible nostalgia for how a lot of my own reading was done from the age of 5 – 13 ¾ when a book one was in the midst of reading just had to be consumed, and consume it one would, wherever you were walking, standing, lying down, eating, peeing, pooing, or in a swimming pool (backstroke).

Of course, I am now far too self-conscious and “mindful” to do this anymore, but I certainly read (on an iPhone, and occasionally even in a book) a lot of  short stories, and listen to them too. Most of the time, I’m listening and walking. Particularly this 10-mile walk in the Chilterns, which I have done this summer almost twice a week. I don’t live in the Chilterns, I just really, really like this walk. Another factor contributing to my somewhat OCD selection is that a) I’m a creature of habit and b) I get antsy when faced with too much “choice”. And yet I don’t want to feel I’m missing out by not choosing differently each time either (inherent paradox alert).

My walk is one of the few I know that starts at one tube station (Chorleywood), finishes at another (Chesham) and yet takes in an incredible array of Hertfordshire scenery (rivers, hills, forests) and hardly a whirr from a motor vehicle at any point.

Having done the walk 20 times or more in the last three months and spent probably about 40 of the 60 hours it takes to walk these 200 miles listening to short stories, I have noticed something quite magical beginning to occur: various parts of the walk have become intimately imbued with the sensations/memories/feelings/words of the stories I’ve been listening to. And these sensual remembrance remains, become somehow hard-wired into the act of doing the walk itself.

So for example, whenever I now head out across the Common through the small glade leading to Chorleywood House, I am once again transported to the first few pages/minutes of Alison Macleod’s The Heart of Denis Noble. It is like the enclosing foliage almost synaesthetically mirrors Noble’s delicious, spaced-out “succumbing to the opioids”, the pre-op Schubert soundtrack taking him on a Lethian trip down memory lane, along “the meandering river of fentanyl from the IV drip”.


Once past the cemetery, heading towards hills and clear warm water The River Chess beyond, a giant sugar-beet comes crashing through the windscreen of consciousness and thumps down beside me courtesy of Jon McGregor’s Wires. Perhaps this part of the story has struck and stuck here not only because I listened to it wending my way down this path, but also because this is the one part of the walk that veers relatively close to the M25 where this story, at least for me, is now taking place. Perpetually. Certainly every time I do my Chorleywood to Chesham walk.


So many sights and sounds in one walk, so rich with recollection.

Even a particular stile in a particular field near Sarrat Bottom where Miette’s reading of Kyle Minor's astonishing The Truth and All Its Ugly suddenly becomes incredibly dark and weird, forcing me to actually stop for a moment, lean slightly into a hedge, catching my breath, muttering “shit, shit” or some other startled imprecation. 


And what of the many woods and springs and meadows along this walk, now littered like autumn leaves with Alan Davis Drake's wonderfully mellifluous Chekhov readings? Or the twenty hours of listening to Richard Yates Collected Short stories, or Paul Bowles, the twenty-five blissed out hours of Nabokov?


Or this stone-bench near one of the weirs? The one resting on a patient and/or malevolent bunny’s head, where someone sells eggs and plants on the side of the bridleway (help yourself, leave some money in a tin - the trusting reciprocity of village economics). This granite stone comma on which I’d rested for a minute or two, closing my eyes, head propped up on an empty water bottle, suddenly transported to a small aerodrome in Texas where KJ Orr’s “she” meets her future astronaut husband “he”.


Every time I go on this walk, it gets better, richer, more involving. Were I to continue doing this walk for years (and I see no reason not to) I can imagine a point where each step (all 19,465 of them; yes, I have an Omron pedometer) will have a particular real-time as well as superimposed mythical-time resonance to it. 

I think this what Bruce Chatwin was trying to communicate in his ode to the Aboriginal walkabout. I’ve read Songlines (twice), but like most things, I needed to walk it to get it.

Has anyone else experienced this sort of thing? If you haven’t you should, because it’s incredibly moving and meaningful. 

So here’s my DIY guide to creating your own Strolling Storyline.

  1. Choose a relatively long walk that you would feel happy doing on a regular basis (preferably in the countryside).
  2. Walk it.
  3. Divide your walk between:
    1. listening to short stories (your choice, but some great downloads here & here)
    2. walking silently, with no aural input; just walking, as mindful and fully-embodied as possible
    3. listening to music (Ashkenazy playing Chopin’s Nocturnes, Rachmaninov’s Four Piano Concertos, and the first two Arctic Monkey albums have worked well in the Chilterns for me this summer).
    4. chat: either with the self, or if in company, to another
  4. Revel in the bliss of being fortunate enough to do this sort of thing. Smile and grin at yourself and the world if you can.
  5. Repeat.
  6. Repeat again. And again.

The stories I’ve mentioned in this piece, apart from those I offer links for, can be found in this collection, published by Comma Press. I'd also recommend Rebecca Solnit's Wanderlust (A History of Walking) & Geoff Nicholson's The Lost Art of Walking as literary-spiritual primers.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

"Sleepy", by Anton Chekhov (1888)

I wonder if Robert Coover was in some way paying homage to this story in his weird, and (I think) delightful PoMo tale we read last month: The Babysitter. There are echoes of Dr Chekhov in Coover's fragmented half-dream-half-real presentation, or maybe not.

Whatever Coover was trying to do with that story (and we were in somewhat deep disagreement in our discussion last month about exactly what he was trying to achieve), Chekhov, as in most cases, got there first. Wherever that "there" is.

You might not want to listen to this late at night though. It's a very creepy story.






[Download story]

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

To Kindle, or to Nook: THAT is the eQuestion

The Better-Than-Kindle Nook? But only one (dodgy) online retailer selling it in the UK.

I have a love-hate relationship with books as physical objects. 

Or to be more precise: a love-sadness relationship. Having had to "let go" of thousands of books at certain times in my somewhat peripatetic life, I am keenly aware that whilst books do furnish a room, they can also become (en-masse) a Sisyphean boulder requiring constant pushing up ramps into removal vans, and paying of monthly storage fees to house them.

When I'm considering buying a book, my first thought (after "I want you-oo", crooned Elvis-Costello-like in the direction of the tome) is how many kilos it's going to add to a suitcase or a cardboard box marked "BOOKS" being hoiked up a ladder into someone's loft. A good part of my motivation to gift a first edition of Infinite Jest to a friend for his birthday recently, was carrying that 3.25 kg mass in a shoulder bag on my daily commute, noticing the musculo-skeletal wear and tear of this devotion after a month or so.

Thus, perhaps more than anyone I know, I am socially, economically, demographically, and most importantly psychologically primed to have/be an eReader. Yes, I love the feel and look of books, but the sheer unburdened freedom of being able to carry a whopper (or hundreds of whoppers) around with me on an object that weighs less than a couple of Mars bars, is an almost incontrovertible selling point.

So why haven't I bought one yet?

Well, I am worried about giving Amazon lock, key and sole proprietorship of all the texts I choose to purchase from them hereon in. You've probably heard Amazon Agnostics already espousing on the subject in a similar anti-monopolistic vein. Why should Amazon become, as they are threatening to become, the main purveyors of the entirety of our lexical culture?

But mainly I'm worried about Amazon's Kindle and its AZW format in which all its books are encoded. I am worried that Kindle may truly become "the only show in town", as one publisher recently described the lightweight Über Object to me. Once upon a time VHS was the only show in town, but where is it now? 

Maybe I'm just not getting it, but I simply can't understand why readers would choose to lock themselves into an Amazon eStockade, when one day they might like to read all their books off something other than a Kindle: maybe the palm of their hands, or on a piece of toast. 

If you buy Amazon, you are enslaved to Amazon. If you buy your books as generic ePubs (which can be read on any other eReader, apart from Kindle), you are "free". Free to convert the files to whatever format you need for whatever reader you have, free to share files with friends, the way you might share books with friends, not in anyway enslaved to a huge multinational corporation which is fast becoming, Walmart-like, a one stop shop for everything and anything and sod anyone else who might like a slice of the pie.

So why aren't more people/retailers expressing interest in the just-as-good-if-not-better-than-Kindle Nook or Kobo eReaders (I've had a nightmare buying a Nook off the awful Purely Gadgets, the only UK distributor of the device so far)? And why are most of the small publishers I approach spinning the Kindle-Is-The-Only-Show-In-Town yarn, when it clearly isn't, or shouldn't be?

Could this have anything to do with Amazon's loss-leading push of their reading devices, their gargantuan advertising budgets promoting their eReader as the only eReader you'll ever need, the way the God Marines sold Christianity to the "natives" in the 16th century?

I am genuinely surprised that the zeitgeist (especially from publishers I've talked to) seems to be one of completely swallowing the hype and signing on to become a Lifelong Vassal of Amazon Inc.

Borges' Infinite Book is almost within our grasp, and it is probably in the shape of an eReader. But do we want our sole access to it to be dependent on one man with a slightly unsettling laugh

Not me.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Short Story Book Clubs = Better Conversations?

Listening this morning to Olivia O'Leary's lovely programme on one of my all-time heroes (Theodore Zeldin) and his New (Better?) Conversation initiative made me realize that our Short Story Book Club is not intrinsically about great short stories (although of course we are conscientiously and pleasurably focused on the little blighters) but more about facilitating great conversation.


Zeldin-ish conversation, that is: inclusive, honest, genuinely interested in another persons take on a shared topic/story, and supportive.
In a sense, I see the Club's raison d'être as quite different to a lit-crit gathering. I'm sure we've all been-there, done-that, got the withering ("Oh-I-wish-you'd-shut-up") looks from snooty dons and People Who Know Better (Or More) Than Us.  I'm pretty sure though that Zeldin wouldn't see this competitive one-upmanship as a Conversation Killer rather than as a facilitator.


So I wonder if it might be an idea, following the format of his conversation dinners, to explicitly structure the evening a tad. Just so that we don't automatically fall into the groove of convo-stranger-dynamics where a modicum of unease clogs the conversational channels.  With this in mind, we've agreed to have a kind of short-list of stories that we'll mainly be focusing on. 




All these stories be great conversation-starters in themselves.But we might also brainstorm before we meet a few (simple, but honest) conversation-starting questions. Just to get the ball rolling:

  • Blackberry Winter: Why doesn't the boy tell his father about potentially dangerous hobo who's just rocked up at the farmhouse?
  • O City of Broken Dreams: Is this not a very early (1948) prediction of the PoMo surface-no-content culture we're living in NOW?
  • The Magic Barrel: Is the final match a double-bluff on the father's part to get the two of them together?
  • Good Country People: Who's more cruel in this story, the bible salesman or the writer?
  • Upon the Sweeping Flood: Why, in God's name, does he do it?
  • The Babysitter: Is the ending a cop-out?
If you fancy adding some questions to our conversation menu, for all the stories, or just some, please do stick those in the comments box either on meet-up, or the blog. Also, t'would be great if you (and friends/family etc.) could head on over and "LIKE" our FB page, as it seems we need 20 followers or more to get a dedicated Page Name, and put ourselves in the running for winning a goldfish.

"O City of Broken Dreams" - John Cheever (1948)

Have you heard about a sub-precept of Sod's Law called Reading-Aloud Sod's Law (R.A.L.S)?

Simply stated: this is the likelihood that at the very moment you position your iPhone on the edge of the sofa, and sit yourself down on a meditation cushion, legs crossed Burmese-style to record a classic Cheever short story, someone in the vicinity who is not shush-able, will begin to hammer or drill or cackle uncontrollably.

Hopefully the unadulterated Cheeverness of this short story will survive the initial background noises and subsequent moving of reader and iPhone to another room halfway through in order to finish perched on the edge of the bed, iPhone balanced precariously on the side of a bookcase. If not, I am happy to supply you with neighbour's address for reparation requests.

[Download a reading of the story]

Monday, September 5, 2011

"In The Zoo", by Jean Stafford (1953)

The beautiful Jean Stafford.

That is, before the "uncouth, neurotic, psycopathic murder-poet" (AKA Robert Lowell) drove the two of them into a wall, conferring upon Jean defacement and hospital traumas that she would go on to sublimate in one of the most gruesome short stories I've ever winced through (The Interior Castle).

Keywords from the Literature, Art, and Medicine Database on that story say it all: Anesthesia, Doctor-Patient Relationship, Hospitalization, Medical Advances, Medical Testing, Obsession, Pain, Patient Experience, Physical Examination, Rebellion, Surgery, Trauma.

David Cronenberg (or Almodovar, if you're a September, 2011 Zeitgeister) eat your heart out.

This one is pretty visceral too. But more in a way that twangs at the heart strings like a raw, ol' blues song. Lots of parallels between this story and Edward Albee's similarly named one-act play - though I'm still not quite sure who got there first, chicken-and-egg-wise. I think it was Stafford.

PS For a reading of The Interior Castle, please make your way over to the preternaturally tasteful Miette's Bedtime Stories podcast.

Monday, August 29, 2011

"City Boy", by Leonard Michaels (1969)

This story makes me laugh, inwardly, or if having consumed beer, I might even use throat, teeth and tongue, and do a proper LOL. Often the laugh (inward, or out) is in different places to the times I'd laughed when reading it before. And it's great fun to read aloud. You should try it. It feels very Portnoy, which was of course published in the same year as this: 1969.

Incidentally (very incidentally), Micheals' protagonist is called Phillip, and Roth's is called Alex(ander), which strikes a similar register to Leonard, although I don't think either Roth or Michaels were tipping their hats (or cocking a snook) at each other.

Even the year (1969) has a scabrous, slightly surreal silliness to it looks-wise: all those beast-with-two-backs sixes and nines. So much so that at the end of the piece I couldn't actually bring myself to read the year, which Ford appends to every story in the anthology. Also, how does one intonate Veronica's demand (entreaty?) to Philip in the last paragraph? My reading of it sounds a little cranky, when presumably she would have uttered the endearment...well, how?

Answers on an MP3, please.

[Download the story

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Christmas Stories, edited by Diana Secker Tesdell

When I read on Amazon a couple of one-star reviews (bear with me) for Diana Secker Tesdell's selection of Christmas stories, I knew straight off that this would the perfect collection for our group to be reading and talking about this December.

The first review, written by a certain Francis M. Schiraldi of Eugene, Oregon fulminates thus:

"Every home that celebrates Christmas deserves an anthology of beloved holiday stories that enrich the season. This is not it. Despite the nostalgic cover and the ribbon marker, this rather unpleasant collection lacks most of the familiar and seems to focus on the morbid and depressing. Probably more suited to the jaded and cynical reader, don't buy this one if you are looking for an abridged version of 'A Christmas Carol' to read aloud or 'The Night Before Christmas.'"

In the second review, with a sharp intake of breath, Mary C. Hattan of Coosa County, Alabama opines:

"The stories were not what I expected. They included Lesbians, alchoholics, and for the most part the stories were not the warm ones I would share with my friends."
Well, Francis and Mary.

Aware as we are that Christmas, for many people, is as much about loneliness and alienation (short story territory par excellence) as Victorian families gathered round fires with cheeky urchins caroling in the snow-bedecked yard, we say: BRING ON THE MORBID, DEPRESSING, LESBIAN-FRIENDLY CHRISTMAS TALES (please).

Although the cover of the volume is the kind of naff you'd expect from a self-promoting Christmas Collection, it's stuffed to the gills with wonderful stories by the likes of  Tolstoy, John Updike, Alice Munro, Grace Paley, and even Vlad Nabokov.

A more measured review of Tessdale's selection, written by Penelope Lively in The Independent, can be found here.

Friday, August 19, 2011

The Best International Short Story Collection of 2011 (maybe)

At this very moment, in a Top Secret International Venue*, three highly esteemed Lit-Criterati** are debating the merits of a collection of short stories published in 2011, with the primary expectation of handing out a very large sum of wonga "rewarding an individual author's commitment to this most exacting of forms and encouraging the publication of collections of stories in book form as distinct from single stories in periodicals".

Yep, it's the Frank O'Connor International Short Story Award, which is either going to be won this year by:


Gold Boy, Emerald Girl - Yiyun Li (Beijing-born, American Resident)
Light Lifting - Alexander MacLeod (Canadian debutante)
Saints and Sinners - Edna O’Brien (Irish)
Death is Not an Option - Suzanne Rivecca (American Debutante)
The Empty Family - Colm Tóibín (Irish)
Marry or Burn - Valerie Trueblood (American)

We will be reading THE WINNER.

(Alas, this is the way our X-Factoried world works: people want to read WINNERS, not LOSERS, even if the winner in this case might not be the book of stories that is best placed to foment your personal and probably rather particular spiritual, aesthetic and humoral juices.)

If you want to spend some time with a couple of  LOSERS (I'm currently reading Colm Tóibín's collection, see photo, who has the face but not the literary CV of a LOSER), you may wish to work your way through the whole darn short list, or even the long one.  Whatever you do, we will be gathering to discuss on November 16, the WINNER of this year's Frank O'Connor International Story Collection.

Should also be a nice tie-in with National Short Story Week, if you go for these kinds of annual remembrances.

*Slough
**They did it for the free books. Wouldn't you?

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Will the real (i.e. best translated) Chekhov please stand up?

If we're going to do this proper-like, it makes sense (at least at the beginning of our endeavor) to tip our collective hats to the progenitor of the modern short story, Anton Pavlovich Chekhov. So this is who we shall be reading and discussing in October's Meet-up.

As Chris Power says in the first entry for A Brief Survey of The Short Story:

"I couldn't justify starting with anyone else because for me he's the uncontestable father of the modern short story, both by dint of bridging 19th-century realism and 20th-century experimentation and because his stories are some of the best that have ever been written. Plus, spit in a bookshop and chances are you'll hit something marked by his influence. Unless you're in the coffee bar."

Indeed.

But which translation to go for? A bit of Internet delving would seem to suggest that the husband and wife team of Pevear and Volokhonsky are at the moment in possession of the leafiest of the translation laurels, but but Mr Knowles has said he'd sound out a Professor or two on this matter too (thank you Mr Knowles).

Here's a pic of Pevear and Volokhonsky, BTW. Bless.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

"A Perfect Day for Bananfish" by J.D Salinger

Richard Ford mentions in his intro to the Granta selection that he was unable to include the following story because of the anal-retentiveness of the Salinger Estate. One wonders if they're still so finicky post-mortem. A brief Google-search confirms this may be the case.

So who knows how long the reading I've made of this story will stay on here until J.D's legal rottweiler (Pam Malpas) decides to drop me a line.

Looking forward to getting some mail from the esteemed Harold Ober Associates Incorporated,  425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

(Pam, please address all correspondence to theshortstorybookclub AT gmail.com. Cheers.)

[Download a reading of the story]

Monday, August 15, 2011

The Granta Book of the American Short Story, Edited by Richard Ford

As I'm something of a sucker for American short story writers, I thought I'd nail our colours (though not necessarily red, white, and blue) to the mast and suggest we get our club a-rockin' and a-rollin' with this superb selection by Richard Ford.

Oodles and oodles of good stuff to be savoured and talked about. Classics and stories-on-the-verge-of- becoming-classics. It also trounces the Joyce Carol Oates Oxford collection, I would suggest, which I find to be a somewhat overtly well-meaning, and didactic affair.

The Ford selection is however, a big fat collection, and I know that one of the undeclared aims of our group is not to have to feel the ponderous heft of Literature weighing down upon us from month to month as we submit to the pleasures of short fiction. So please feel free to read a couple of pieces only; whatever takes your fancy really.

As opposed to novels, which I would expect to hook me in a chapter or two, I usually don't force myself to read much beyond the second page of a story that's not exciting me. However, saying that, there is the odd tale that has won me over on page three or four. Few and far between though. The whole raison d'etre of the form (God bless it) is to grab you from the offset.

More about the September Meet Up and future books we'll be exploring can be found here.